<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Getting A New Site Indexed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marketingconfidential.com/private/seo/getting-a-new-site-indexed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marketingconfidential.com/private/seo/getting-a-new-site-indexed/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2010 17:28:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Davis</title>
		<link>http://marketingconfidential.com/private/seo/getting-a-new-site-indexed/comment-page-1/#comment-4003</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Davis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Dec 2009 06:57:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marketingconfidential.com/private/?p=251#comment-4003</guid>
		<description>It still amazes me that Google places such high priority on blogging platforms versus standard websites. Why do you suppose that is?

I guess the bigger issue is this: If Google indexes WP sites quickly, go with WP! I do a ton of websites on WP for its flexibility and speed to market. However, now that I now a WP site is indexed so quickly, then here&#039;s another reason to stick with it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It still amazes me that Google places such high priority on blogging platforms versus standard websites. Why do you suppose that is?</p>
<p>I guess the bigger issue is this: If Google indexes WP sites quickly, go with WP! I do a ton of websites on WP for its flexibility and speed to market. However, now that I now a WP site is indexed so quickly, then here's another reason to stick with it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

